Skip to main content
F&R
Home
About F&R
Contact F&R
Services
Newsroom
Projects
Training
Careers
Newsroom
Header

Engineering Stability Since 1881                                                              April 2011

A User’s Guide to Concrete Test Reports — Part 2

Concrete Testing As we mentioned last month, Portland cement concrete is probably the most common material found at a construction site. The concrete test report would probably be the second most common, with the possibility of hundreds of individual reports representing thousands of test specimens.

Test Requirements

Evaluation of these project concrete results requires “valid” test data (test specimens must be 28 days old) and the test reports considered must provide the minimum information required by ASTM C39, Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens. Furthermore, according to American Concrete Institute (ACI) 318, “… a strength test is valid provided at least two individual 6 by 12 in. cylinder strengths or at least three 4 by 8 in. cylinders are averaged”. Single cylinder compressive strength test results should not be included or considered in involution of concrete used in a project.

The acceptance criteria stated in ACI 318 (section 5.6.3.3) mandates:

  • The average of three consecutive strength tests equal or exceed design compressive strength f’c .
  • No individual strength tests falls below f’c by more than 500 psi when f’c is 5,000 psi or less or by more than 10% of f’c when f’c is greater than 5,000 psi.

(Note: f’c = compressive strength of the specified concrete)

Benefits of the Concrete Test Report

The concrete test report can provide important information in the investigation of non-conforming concrete. A complete report should include:

  • Batch, arrival and completion times;
  • Slump and air content;
  • Concrete temperature;
  • Quantity of water additions to the concrete; and
  • Weather conditions.

Part of the reason that all of this information is required (and important) is because data collected at the time of a test will sometimes explain why a test sample may be in non-compliance. For example:

  • Delays in arrival or placement may alter the characteristics of the concrete and affect strength.
  • High slump or air content can reduce compressive strength.
  • High ambient and/or concrete temperatures reduce the concrete strength potential.
  • Freezing temperature can significantly retard the strength gain of concrete.

When problems are found, it is also prudent to request that the testing lab conduct an internal review to verify that proper testing procedures were followed and if there were any deviations from normal practice in handling and curing the specimens at the project. Concurrently, the concrete supplier should verify that the correct concrete mix was delivered and determine if there were any batching issues with the load in question. If no significant issues are found in the batching and testing of the concrete, field investigation of the questionable concrete may be warranted. Any investigation should be co-ordinated with the project structural engineer regarding test methods, sampling and critical locations.

Part 3 of this series shall review evaluation methods for questionable concrete.

F&R Celebrates Major Milestones in 2011

Dr. Froehling In 1881, Henry Froehling, M.D., Ph.D., a German-born chemist, established a chemical laboratory and coal mining consulting firm in Richmond, Virginia. In 1904 Dr. Andrew Robertson, a Scottish-born chemist, would join Dr. Froehling in business and our firm would adopt its present name.

Today, the company known as Froehling & Robertson, Inc. is the 10th oldest business in Virginia and is celebrating its 130th year of continuous operations.

And what makes 2011 even more auspicious for F&R is the fact that half of our offices are celebrating major anniversaries as well. These include:

Over the next few months, as a celebration of these milestones, we will be highlighting interesting and historical information about each of these offices.

This month, however, we take a quick look back at the company as a whole and investigate how we got here.

From Chemistry to Engineering

Dr. Robertson Initially, conceived as a chemical laboratory and coal mining consulting firm, F&R opened its doors in 1881 and immediately began providing services to companies from New York to Atlanta.

In 1929, Samuel H. Shieb, M.D., Ph.D., is named president and F&R adds physical testing among its services offered in the fields of cement, bituminous materials, steel, and timber.

In 1937, Dr. Scheib is succeeded by Grant J. Durant. Under Mr. Durant’s leadership, F&R enters the fields of non-destructive testing, soil and foundation investigations, and geotechnical engineering.

In the 1970s, under the guidance of presidents J.M. George and Jack Thompson, F&R expands our service lines again, this time into the area of environmental engineering.

Mimi Proctor

Much of the credit for the firm’s longevity and current success belongs to Mrs. Mimi Sheib Proctor, the genteel and soft-spoken woman who has owned and operated F&R for the last 30 years.

Her father, Dr. Sam Sheib, succeeded Henry Froehling as F&R president in the 1930s, and her mother ran the company until her death in the early 1970s. Mrs. Proctor took the company’s reins before it was common for women to do so in any industry. Her mother paved much of the way before her, yet it fell on Mrs. Proctor’s shoulders to steer her family’s business through the harsh economic downturns of the 1970s, 1980s, and 2000s that gutted local and national construction and construction-related companies.

Under her guidance (and that of her late husband, Mr. Arnold Proctor, who died in 1996), F&R has not only survived these perilous times, but has continued to thrive.

A Thank You to Our Clients

In 1881, the largest client the firm had paid less than $300 in fees. Today, we have numerous long-term clients who have been with us for years and who have billings that total in the millions of dollars.

This is not merely inflation at work. This success is the culmination of a dream that each and every one of our clients have helped to make a reality.

We appreciate the trust that each of the tens of thousands of clients we have helped over the past 130 years have shown in us.

Ben Hestir, P.E. Joins F&R as Greenville Environmental Group Manager

Ben Hestir Froehling & Robertson, Inc. is pleased to announce that Benjamin Hestir, P.E. has joined our Greenville, South Carolina office as Environmental Group Manager.

With over 18 years of experience as an environmental engineer and industrial hygienist, Ben has conducted or managed hundreds of projects involving hazardous waste, due diligence, industrial hygiene, health & safety, and environmental risk management.

He will continue to support his existing client base as a project manager for issues affecting commercial property owners nationwide.

"This move to F&R will allow me to draw upon additional professional resources and greatly enhance my ability to help my clients manage their environmental risks at any point in the life cycle of their property ownership," Ben said shortly after arriving at F&R.

Please feel free to contact Ben and discuss how he can be of continued service to you.

Newsroom