Skip to main content
F&R
Home
About F&R
Contact F&R
Services
Newsroom
Projects
Training
Careers
Newsroom
Header

Engineering Stability Since 1881                                                              October 2011

Interpreting Compressive Strength Testing Results for Masonry Mortar

Masonry Mortar Undoubtedly if you’ve been involved in a project that involves masonry construction, then you’ve probably dealt with a question that has puzzled many: “why do the compressive strength tests of mortar continue to ‘fail’?” The answer to the question is somewhat complicated, but in the end it is generally what all project participants want to hear: “well, it doesn’t necessarily fail.” The process of getting from this question to the answer is worth an explanation.

Mortar that is designed to be used with concrete masonry units (CMU) for structural applications is an important building element. For states that model their building code off of the latest version of the International Building Code, verification of masonry strength (f’m) is required for all masonry materials by ACI 530.1. This includes compressive strength testing for mortar. Prior to the field testing, mortar mixes should first be designed in a laboratory in accordance with either the Proportion specification or the Property specification of ASTM C270, “Specification for Mortar for Unit Masonry.” When the Property specification is used (and in many areas it is the only specification possible due to the locally available materials) the mortar mix is tested under laboratory conditions to prove that it meets certain properties.

As it would seem obvious, laboratory conditions are usually not the same as field conditions. Mortar mixed in the laboratory generally uses much less water as compared to what is used in the field. Unlike concrete where water does not evaporate from the mix, water can and does evaporate from a mortar mix in the field. To account for this, experienced masons know the right amount of water to add to a mortar mix in order to make it “workable.” To an extent, they can also re-temper a mortar mix with more water to account for the evaporation. The variation in the water content of the mortar plays a major role in the compressive strength of mortar specimens. Simply put, because more water is used in the field than in the laboratory, the 28-day compressive strength results of the mortar mixed in the field will be lower than the mortar mixed in the laboratory. Therefore, if a mortar is designed in the laboratory to have a compressive strength value of 1,800 psi at 28-days (typical of most Type S masonry cements) then it can (and should) be expected to have a lower compressive strength value in the field.

This now begs the question of how should one determine acceptance of field mixed mortar. Instead of focusing on a “target” compressive strength value from the beginning, the emphasis should be placed on making sure that the mortar is mixed properly (i.e. the way it was mixed during trials in the laboratory). This means ensuring that the same materials are being used from the sand to the cement. At the beginning of masonry construction it is also helpful to perform other ASTM C780 tests to establish baseline field-mixed mortar parameters.

These include tests for cone penetration, mortar water content, and mortar aggregate content. This establishes “base line” values that subsequent batches of mortar should intend to replicate throughout the project. The compressive strength results of this “baseline” mortar mix now become the “target.” The expectation is that future mortar compressive strength tests will also have this same value. If they don’t, then it likely means that there was an inconsistency in the mix of the mortar which should then be explored.

For an example, let’s say that a Type S masonry cement will be used to construct an 8-inch load-bearing CMU wall. Laboratory mixes show that the design compressive strength of the mortar is 1,800 psi when mixed at a 2.5:1 ratio (i.e. 2.5 cubic feet of sand to 1 cubic foot of Type S masonry cement). In the field, the same sand source and cement are used at the same proportions. ASTM C780 tests for the field mixed mortar show that it has a cone penetration value of 52 mm, a wet mortar water content of 13.3%, and a mortar aggregate ratio of 2.5:1. The average 28-day compressive strength value for this mortar is 1,300 psi. This is now the baseline data for this project. Because all of the properties established in the laboratory were met, then future compressive strength testing results of the field mixed mortar should expect to have a value of 1,300 psi.

As demonstrated by this example, what is important to mortar is that proper proportions and properties are met in the field. Because the greatest variable from the laboratory to the field is the amount of water in the mix, the compressive strength test results should not be expected to be identical.

F&R Now Offering Air Barrier Consulting for General Contractors and Building Owners

Air Barrier Testing Identifying Inefficiencies…

Meeting Design Requirements…

Minimizing Costs…

All are paramount to a successful approach to energy efficient construction. Air barrier testing plays a critical role in efforts to not only ensure energy efficiency, but avoid mold growth and other numerous indoor air quality problems as well. As a result, the inclusion of air barrier and building envelope specifications in the plans for newly constructed buildings are becoming more commonplace. In fact, this specification is already in place for all U.S. Army new construction projects, and the desire to meet this requirement is quickly spreading to other government and commercial facility owners.

In response to the needs of our clients, many of whom are being forced to address these new standards for the first time, F&R has launched an air barrier testing service line. This service helps general contractors and facility owners comply with air leakage requirements and determine the source of any air and moisture leaks that may be occurring. To accomplish these goals, F&R utilizes the most advanced building pressurization and depressurization technology available while conforming to standards. Once the source of any breach is determined, F&R’s construction materials engineers can provide recommendations for repair.

At the recently completed Spotsylvania Courthouse project, F&R’s environmental and construction testing professionals performed air leakage testing in accordance with ASTM standards. Using blower door fans, digital manometers, and state-of-the-art software, leakage measurements were collected and the envelope leakage rate was determined to be slightly above the designer’s strict standards. F&R’s professionals worked with the general contractor to identify and repair a leak at the sally port CMU wall, thus decreasing the envelope leakage rate. Follow-up envelope tightness testing demonstrated a much improved leakage rate that met Spotsylvania County’s satisfaction.

It’s a Wrap!
New Fort Belvoir Community Hospital Construction Completed

Fort Belvoir Hospital

The new $1 billion Fort Belvoir joint services military hospital has opened and is providing treatment to service members injured in Iraq and Afghanistan, their families, and patients at the current Walter Reed, DeWitt, and Andrews Air Force Base medical facilities.

The 1.2 million square foot facility is part of the 2005 Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) program aimed at replacing older facilities like Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, DC with new, larger, more energy efficient, and state-of-the art military treatment centers to serve our service men and women. The Fort Belvoir Community Hospital complex consists of a nine story main hospital, 2 three story and 2 two story clinical buildings, two parking structures, an ambulance shelter, helipad, and utility plant and tunnel.

F&R has long been involved in the continuous development of the Fort Belvoir military base in Fairfax County, so we were the clear choice of the contracting team (led by a joint venture between Turner and Gilbane) to provide construction materials testing services on the new facility. These services are part of a three phase quality control program implemented by Turner/Gilbane JV in support of the massive construction project. F&R engineers and technicians specifically provided testing and inspection services on earthwork, concrete, Controlled Modulus Columns, structural steel, fire resistance materials, masonry, and asphalt.

We are proud to have had the opportunity to contribute to an endeavor that will specifically benefit our veterans and their families.

Bell Promoted to Manager of F&R’s Fredericksburg Operations Center

Carl Bell, PE F&R is happy to announce that Carl Bell, P.E. has accepted a promotion to become the Operations Manager for F&R’s Fredericksburg Operations Center. Mr. Bell will have administrative authority for all aspects of the office, including personnel assignments, project oversight and client satisfaction, business development, and human resources.

“F&R’s Fredericksburg Operations Center is an important and strategic office,” said F&R President Sam Kirby, P.E. “I am thrilled to have Carl running this operation, and I am looking forward to seeing how he puts his dynamism, creative thinking, and business acumen to work for our clients in this key marketplace.”

Mr. Bell is a geotechnical and materials testing engineer who has been with F&R since 2004. Prior to accepting this promotion, he was the Fredericksburg Construction Services Group Manager.

Mr. Bell has served as project manager on numerous projects for clients including residential, commercial, military, state governments, and local governments. He has performed various third party inspections and Special Inspections for soils, concrete, masonry, structural steel and other building materials. He also has experience with many specialty foundation systems including auger-cast piles, helical anchors, rammed aggregate piers and caissons.

Newsroom